In-House vs Outsourced Finance Director: Which Is Right for Your Agency?

Every growing agency reaches the point where bookkeeping alone is not enough. You need strategic financial leadership — but does that mean hiring a full-time finance director, or can you get the same value from an outsourced FD at a fraction of the cost?

When Does an Agency Need a Finance Director?

Most agencies operate without any strategic finance function until something forces the issue: a cash flow crisis, a failed bank covenant, a tax bill they did not see coming, or the realisation that they have no idea which clients are actually profitable.

The typical trigger points are: revenue exceeding £500k (complexity increases), headcount above 10 (payroll and HR costs become material), planning an acquisition or exit (due diligence requires clean financials), or losing money on projects without understanding why.

  • Revenue above £500k and growing — complexity outpaces basic bookkeeping
  • Headcount above 10 — payroll, pensions, and employment costs need active management
  • Cash flow is unpredictable despite healthy revenue on paper
  • You are planning to raise investment, acquire, or sell the business
  • You do not know which clients or projects are profitable and which are losing money
  • Tax planning is reactive (year-end surprises) rather than proactive

The Cost Comparison

This is where the outsourced model wins for most agencies. A full-time finance director in London commands £80,000–£150,000 in salary alone. Add employer NI (15%), pension, benefits, and recruitment costs, and the true cost is £100,000–£190,000 per year.

An outsourced FD typically costs £1,000–£4,000 per month depending on the scope of work and how many days per month they are involved. That is £12,000–£48,000 per year — a fraction of the in-house cost.

Feature
In-House FD
Outsourced FD
Annual cost
£100,000–£190,000 (salary + NI + pension + benefits)
£12,000–£48,000 (£1k–£4k/month)
Recruitment cost
£20,000–£40,000 (agency fee or executive search)
£0 — no recruitment process
Time to onboard
3–6 months to recruit, 3+ months to full effectiveness
2–4 weeks to full effectiveness
Flexibility
Fixed cost regardless of workload
Scale up or down month to month
Notice period
3–6 months typical for senior hires
1 month typical
Risk if wrong fit
High — 6–12 months of cost before realising
Low — switch providers quickly

Expertise and Breadth of Experience

An in-house FD brings deep knowledge of your specific business over time. They attend every meeting, understand every client relationship, and can respond in real time to financial questions.

An outsourced FD brings breadth. They work with multiple agencies simultaneously and have seen the patterns before — they know what good looks like across the industry. They bring benchmarking data, proven frameworks, and lessons learned from other agencies’ successes and mistakes. For most agencies, this breadth of pattern recognition is more valuable than the depth of a single-company focus.

  • In-house FD: deep knowledge of your business, available daily, fully embedded
  • Outsourced FD: breadth across multiple agencies, benchmarking data, industry patterns
  • Outsourced FDs have typically worked with 20–50+ agencies — they spot problems faster
  • In-house FD may become siloed without external reference points
  • Best outsourced FDs bring a network of contacts (lawyers, brokers, bankers)

Flexibility and Scalability

Agency revenue is rarely linear. You win a big client and need more financial support. You lose one and need to cut costs. An outsourced FD flexes with you — increase from one day a month to three days during a busy period, then scale back when things settle.

With an in-house hire, the cost is fixed. If revenue dips 20%, you still pay the same salary. If you need to let them go, you are looking at 3–6 months’ notice plus potential redundancy costs. For agencies below £2m revenue, this inflexibility is a significant risk.

How to Decide: The Decision Framework

There is no universal right answer. The decision depends on your agency’s size, complexity, growth trajectory, and what you actually need from a finance function. Use this framework to guide your thinking.

Feature
Scenario
Recommendation
Revenue under £1m
Outsourced FD (1–2 days/month)
Cost-effective strategic oversight alongside your accountant
Revenue £1m–£3m
Outsourced FD (2–4 days/month)
Full strategic support without the overhead of a senior hire
Revenue £3m–£5m
Either — depends on complexity
Consider in-house if daily financial decisions are complex
Revenue £5m+
In-house FD or full-time CFO
Complexity and volume justify a dedicated senior hire
Planning an exit in 2–3 years
Outsourced FD with M&A experience
They have done it before and know what buyers look for
Rapid growth (50%+ YoY)
Outsourced FD scaling to in-house
Start outsourced, recruit in-house once revenue stabilises

Frequently Asked Questions

Ready to talk?

Considering an outsourced finance director for your agency? Our team provides FD-level strategic support alongside day-to-day accounting. Book a free call to explore whether it’s the right fit.

Free Financial Health Check

No obligation. No hard sell. Just a conversation about your agency's finances.